You Believe The Bible And Evolution - Take Another Look

It will never cease to amaze me to what length a humanistic evolutionist (which includes what I call “pseudo-scientists”) will go to discredit God’s creation.  Why is that?  Really, it’s very simple.  Like many humanists he refuses to admit that God exists.  Again, why is that?  Because if he admits that God exists then that makes him subject to, or subordinate to a Higher Power.  Since it is in the rebellious nature of man to go his own way and to be his “own boss” so to speak, he will do anything to attempt to convince himself (and others) that God doesn’t exist.  That makes him his own boss.  In a few words, I’ve just described a humanist.

When you get a bunch of humanistic scientists together, it is incredible what they can come up with to support their unbelief.  The problem is that they use their educational status (scientist) to throw an aura of authenticity and untouchability over anything they decide is “truth”.  Truth to them is what they term the theory of evolution.  Creationists term it the myth of evolution.

So, the general public bought the idea hook, line and sinker, claiming, “Hey, the scientists say so, then  it’s gotta be the truth, right?” - Christians included.

Charles Darwin’s ideas about the gradual evolution of all living things were universally accepted by humanistic evolutionary scientists in the 1830’s. They were published prolifically as “true science” from that time, virtually without challenge, until the recent past.  So much so, that the common people simply accepted it as “law”.  Christians wanted to hold on to their beliefs that God created all things, including man, as the Bible book of Genesis states.  However, being confronted with the popular “scientific truth” of evolution, and not being able to refute it, they simply married the two.  They concluded that God created man, but He did it through millions of years of evolution.  This was a convenient way of skirting a seemingly sticky problem.  However, it also created another sticky problem.  If you believe the Bible, that also includes the Book of Genesis.  It is virtually impossible to fit the idea of evolution there without a really ridiculous amount of twisting and warping of God’s plainly presented Word.  It ends up not being what it plainly says, but what you want it to say. 

One of the men that wreaked tremendous damage to the creation account in Genesis was the famous C. I. Scofield, who published the Scofield Reference Bible.  His copious references were generally very good.  However, he was an evolutionist and went to great lengths to “explain” how the idea of evolution fits into the Book of Genesis.  The Scofield  Bible is a prime example of how people believe “as scripture” the references about the verses, (his opinion) instead of what the verses simply say. 

I urge you to continue with me as my future blogs unfold.  I will elaborate more thoroughly on the ideas and effects of Darwinism, and at length refute the various propositions of evolution and its claims.  My goal is to liberate you from the fiction that you descended from apes and so on, back to a cell floating in some primordial sea. 

I further deeply desire that you, armed with the truth, will go back to Genesis, read it and accept it just as it states, and proclaim “My God, how great thou art”.