Abiogenesis - #1: From Nothing - Something

Here we go again!  Why is it that the subjects I’m presenting to you seem progressively more like “science fiction”?  And more than that, just like the others, the unbelieving public, like obedient innocent sponges, just soak it up like another amazing “scientific truth”.  It never ceases to amaze me.

Our subject is Abiogenesis.  It’s a very interesting word.  The etymology of the word requires it to be broken down into:  a – bios – genesis.  “a” meaning, “the absence of a quality usually possessed”, “bios”, meaning “life”, and “genesis”, meaning “generation”.  Put together, the idea is:  a “beginning that is outside of life.  The word is used by (and I think was coined by) humanistic scientists to, in my opinion, tag a pseudo-scientific name onto something their logic futily begs to explain.  That is:  Evolutionists by definition have to take their logic backwards to its extreme point.  If, as they say, all life had to have evolved from one living cell as a starting point, then they have to answer the question – Where did that cell come from?

I prefer to name our subject “Chemogenesis”, because it is clearer and to the point.  Evolutionists maintain that the first cell had to have self-assimilated all by itself from inert chemicals in the primeval waters. Frankly, we are talking about the generation of life from non-life.  After all we have discussed in my previous blogs, this should be a non-subject.  However, like the previous subjects, the idea of the first self generating cell has been plastered in magazines and textbooks so much that I am compelled to again expose this idea for what it is – pure fantasy.

Let me warn you, just like with our past subjects, evolutionists HAVE TO have faith in the Chemogenesis idea.  All of their faith in evolution DEPENDS on it.  Without it they HAVE TO admit that evolution itself is impossible.  I can assure you that they won’t do that.    In the past, humanists, who make up a large percentage of evolution scientists, have had a virtual monopoly on disseminating their propaganda on the public.  However, in recent years a formidable Creationist Movement has arisen.  They are well equipped with many highly experienced and qualified doctoral level scientists, along with excellent apologists who have virtually shaken the foundation of the evolutionist goal:  to “prove” that God doesn’t exist.  Check out www.icr.org, and www.AnswersInGenesis.org for complete information.  Humanists are up in arms.  “How dare anyone”, they say, “question our great scientific truths that are established beyond any doubt?”  They will scream, yell, gnash their teeth, attack, use pseudo-science, tell half truths, plain lie, slander, belittle and insult creationist scientists until their last breath.  But to no avail.  Because the TRUTH will prevail when it is presented.  

From the outset, please understand that the Chemogenesis idea is pure imaginary hypothesis on the part of the evolutionists.  Obviously it can’t be treated as a scientific subject, because no one ever saw the supposed first cell come into being from inert chemicals.  Science enters into the picture when evolutionist scientists create in their imaginations a myriad of different scenarios of what the primordial world, without life, must have been like.  Stop!  That isn’t science.  That’s story-telling – nothing more.  From there, they delve into a non-ending theoretical “if – then” game, and obviously come to their preconceived conclusion that – “Eureka, YES, the first cell came into being just like we calculated”.  To explain: the “if – then” game means, that “if this and this, and that and that, and the other conditions were present, THEN this and that and the other would occur”.  Of course all their “ifs” and “thens” are all imaginary and designed to make their experiments turn out as they want.  So, their theorizing centers around the question of “would it be possible for a living cell to self create from water with its soluble ingredients”. 

Key to the evolutionists thinking is their imaginative starting scenario of a primordial earth that had over a billion (yes, that’s a billion, with a “b”) years to ever so slowly have the chance to develop their “first cell”.  That ridiculous period of time is necessary for them to stretch their theoretical calculations.  The idea is:  “ in THAT enormous period of time ANYTHING, given the chance could happen”.  As a matter of fact, the factor of enormous periods of time is absolutely necessary for them.  All of evolution NEEDS very long periods of time. 

This gets so far out and really so ridiculously humorous that one might conjecture as to why the evolutionist scientists didn’t simply calculate for a primordial bunny rabbit to jump out of their primordial “soup pond” onto a primordial shore, and be done with it. 

This subject will continue in my next blog.  I will present the practical impossibility of Chemogenesis to ever have occurred.   What do you think of "POOF", and a new cell self generates?  Stay with me.  This gets better.

Meanwhile, think about this:  “You alone are the Lord.  You made the heavens, even the highest heavens, and all their starry host, the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them. You give life to everything, and the multitudes of heaven worship you” (Nehemiah 9:6)